I had been thinking about a very sensitive God who gets all worked up by a mere man's illustration of him in a cartoon.
A cartoon is primarily to look at, laught at and mostly forgotten about in a day or two.
And, if the object of the unintened ridicule gets tochy about it, is he really God?
mmmmm I wonder!
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Friday, February 17, 2006
Dan Brown sure had it all wrong.
You could agree with him only if you go with the theory that Jesus was a man.
And, had Jesus been a man, why bother at all? I mean, he must have been like any other man with other bodily functions. Yes, of course he did all that we do with our bodies except sex.
e didn't have to have it simply because he was a child in his heart /mind. We all know sex takes its origin not in the libido but in the heart/mind. And children don't need to have sex.
In fact they aren't even aware of it.
Too simple?
Think about it, my friend!!
You could agree with him only if you go with the theory that Jesus was a man.
And, had Jesus been a man, why bother at all? I mean, he must have been like any other man with other bodily functions. Yes, of course he did all that we do with our bodies except sex.
e didn't have to have it simply because he was a child in his heart /mind. We all know sex takes its origin not in the libido but in the heart/mind. And children don't need to have sex.
In fact they aren't even aware of it.
Too simple?
Think about it, my friend!!
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
hi everyone
just testing waters!! everybody is welcome to offer me suggestions to develop my blog
thanks
with goodwill to anyone and everyone
rawhand
thanks
with goodwill to anyone and everyone
rawhand
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)